🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."